Особливості відповідальності науково-дослідних установ

Abstract

У статті проведено аналіз наукових поглядів правників на питання відпо відальності. Запропоновано авторське визначення поняття відповідальності науково-дослідних установ. Акцентовано увагу на відсутності єдиного нормативно-правового акта, який би визначав характерну їм відповідальність. Окреслено коло проблем удосконалення відповідальності науково-дослідних установ. The article analyzes the views of scientists on the issue of liability. The author’s definition of the responsibility of research institutions.The attention absence of a single legal act, which would define the characteristic of such institutions responsible. It outlined the range of issues of improving accountability of research institutions. It is proposed to understand under the responsibility of research institutions the means of state influence coercion on illegal actions of research institutions to prevent abuse last principle of legality, and if such a violation - to end illegal acts, restore violated rights and citizens’ legitimate interests and rights. In legal literature as the classic types of legal liability under the laws of Ukraine adopted a differentiated: Administrative responsibility; Disciplinary responsibility; Criminal liability;Civil liability;Constitutional responsibility;International legal responsibility;Financial responsibility. Research institutions are legal entities with different legal form and ownership. The common feature of driving their activity - scientific research for the sake of scientific results. However, these institutions as entities may in its activities violate the established rules of functioning of various public institutions. And if these violations infringe on the established order by the law, they entail occurrence adequate liability. First of all it is necessary to determine which violations can be detected in the activities of research institutions, and thus to the kinds of responsibilities they can be drawn.